Executive Order 14238: Continuing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy
President: Donald J. Trump
Directed named entities and programs to operate at the minimum level required by law and ordered review of statutory and non-statutory functions.
Status: In effect. Is Executive Order 14238 still in effect? Yes. Executive Order 14238 remains in effect. See Federal Register record.

What does Executive Order 14238 do?
Named entities had to identify legally required functions and reduce others, with budget and reporting work assigned to OMB.
Later primary evidence reviewed September 24, 2026: A federal appeals rule recorded reductions in force undertaken pursuant to this order. Official source. The cited steps do not establish every downstream effect.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14238
EO 14238 continues the administration’s direction to reduce federal operations by naming agencies and programs for review and instructing them to operate at the minimum level required by law. It addresses both statutory entities and functions created administratively, which have different legal limits. A President may direct executive officials to review programs and change management priorities, but cannot erase an entity Congress created or stop a mandatory statutory service simply by calling for a reduction. The operative directive appears in the Federal Register text of EO 14238.
The “minimum level required by law” language is a limiting instruction as well as a reduction goal. Agencies must preserve the work Congress requires, meet deadlines, administer benefits and comply with court orders. For each named body, the relevant questions include whether it was established by statute, whether Congress appropriated funds for its work, what duties are mandatory and what functions are discretionary. If an entity has statutory duties, those duties remain unless Congress changes them. If a program is discretionary, the agency still must act within appropriations and applicable administrative law.
Implementation can take several forms: reorganizing staff, reducing optional activities, consolidating support work or proposing legislation to Congress. These are not equivalent outcomes. A public notice that a program is being reviewed shows an assessment has begun; a final agency reorganization or rule supplies stronger evidence of a completed change. The order’s continuing status means its review direction remains part of executive policy, while the legal status of each listed program depends on its own statute, funding and implementation record.
Before and after
Before the order
The named organizations operated under a mixture of statutes, regulations and appropriations.
After the order
Executive-created functions could be ended, while statutory bodies and duties could only be reduced to the lawful minimum and remained subject to funding and personnel law.
A federal appeals rule recorded reductions in force undertaken pursuant to this order.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| Named entity heads | Eliminate non-statutory functions and minimize statutory work | Ongoing |
| OMB | Reject funding requests inconsistent with the order | Budget cycle |
| Agency heads | Submit compliance reports | 14 or 30 days |
What happened next
EO 14238 signed.
Later primary evidence reviewed: A federal appeals rule recorded reductions in force undertaken pursuant to this order.
Legal and source detail
How it works legally
The President cannot abolish a congressionally created entity or mandatory duty by order. Personnel, grants, contracts and rules require their own lawful procedures.
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
- Reduction in Force Appeals (opens in a new tab) Official record
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 24, 2026. How we research →