Executive Order 14392: Ensuring Truthful Advertising of Products Claiming To Be Made in America
President: Donald J. Trump
Directed FTC attention to deceptive Made in America claims and agency checks of federal procurement listings.
Status: In effect.
Is Executive Order 14392 still in effect? Yes. Active; enforcement rests on the FTC Act, Made in USA rule and procurement law.

What does Executive Order 14392 do?
The FTC was asked to prioritize appropriate origin-claim enforcement and consider online marketplace verification rules. Procurement agencies were to review claims and remove misrepresented products, with referrals where warranted.
Later official evidence reviewed October 4, 2026: In April 2026, the FTC announced three enforcement matters it said followed EO 14392: actions involving flag products, home and commercial entertainment systems, and footwear. The agency described its complaints as allegations; proposed settlements still required court approval.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14392
EO 14392 directs the Federal Trade Commission to prioritize enforcement against deceptive “Made in America” claims and asks procurement agencies to review origin representations in federal listings. The Federal Register text assigns an enforcement and procurement review agenda; it does not automatically certify any product as American-made.
The FTC’s Made in USA standard generally requires that a product be “all or virtually all” made in the United States for an unqualified claim. The agency evaluates where final assembly and processing occur and where significant parts and processing originate. Qualified claims can provide more limited information about U.S. content. The order does not replace that standard or create a separate country-of-origin test for every federal program.
Procurement origin rules can differ from consumer advertising standards. Federal contracts may apply Buy American or other statutory requirements with their own definitions, waivers and documentation. A vendor’s marketing label is not necessarily sufficient to show eligibility for a federal preference. To assess implementation, distinguish FTC complaints and settlements from agency procurement certifications and contract decisions.
What happened after
Verified actions after the order
The FTC’s announcement specified proposed consumer-redress amounts of $625,000 for TouchTunes, $167,743 for Americana Liberty and related defendants, and $75,000 for Oak Street Manufacturing. The proposed orders also bar specified misleading origin claims; the flag-related proposal includes textile disclosures. The Commission said the complaints and proposed orders would be filed in federal district courts, so the announcement is evidence of enforcement activity rather than final findings against every defendant.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| President | Issued the executive order and stated the administration policy | March 13, 2026 |
| Named departments and officials | Carry out the directions, reviews and reports specified in the order | According to the deadlines in the primary text |
| Office of the Federal Register | Assigned the EO number and published the signed document | March 18, 2026 |
What happened next
Executive Order 14392 signed.
Order published in the Federal Register.
Legal and source detail
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on October 4, 2026. How we research →