Executive Order 14292: Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research
President: Donald J. Trump
Paused specified dangerous gain-of-function funding and ordered replacement oversight, foreign-research restrictions and nucleic-acid screening policy.
Status: In effect. Is Executive Order 14292 still in effect? Yes. Executive Order 14292 remains in effect. See Federal Register record.

What does Executive Order 14292 do?
The text directs Funding agencies to pause prohibited or concerning research, and OSTP and agencies to replace oversight and screening policies.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14292
EO 14292 pauses specified federally funded research that the administration classifies as dangerous gain-of-function research and directs agencies to create replacement oversight policies. It also addresses foreign research funding and nucleic-acid screening. The order’s assignments are set out in the Federal Register text of EO 14292. It operates through federal funding and agency oversight; it is not a general criminal prohibition on every privately funded biological experiment.
Gain-of-function is a broad scientific term, and the order uses a defined policy scope for the research it covers. Agencies must identify affected awards, communicate funding conditions and determine whether work can proceed under any exception. A pause on federal support can alter project timelines, but it does not itself resolve a scientific question about risk or benefit. Researchers and institutions need the actual agency notice and grant terms to know what work is restricted.
The order also calls for oversight of certain research performed abroad with federal support and screening of synthetic nucleic-acid orders. Those issues involve different mechanisms: grant conditions, institutional review, vendor screening and federal reporting. Any replacement framework must specify covered experiments, risk review, exceptions and accountability. A public-health or security goal does not remove the need for clear standards and fair grant administration. Implementation can be tracked through agency guidance, award decisions and published oversight rules.
Before and after
Before the order
Federal life-sciences oversight used the 2024 DURC/PEPP policy and earlier nucleic-acid screening framework.
After the order
NIH paused flagged projects in 2025; the government issued its Policy for Stopping High-Risk Life Sciences Research on July 28, 2026, with agency guidance and review bodies still being established.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| Funding agencies | Pause prohibited or concerning research | Immediate / continuing |
| OSTP and agencies | Replace oversight and screening policies | Implemented in stages |
| HHS/NIH | Issue implementation guidance | 120 days from Jul 2026 policy |
What happened next
EO 14292 signed.
NIH announced an implementation pause.
NIH expanded suspension guidance.
Government-wide high-risk research policy issued.
Legal and source detail
How it works legally
Funding restrictions must follow grant terms, appropriations and due process. The policy definitions and agency guidance determine project-specific coverage.
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
- NIH 2026 policy notice (opens in a new tab) Official record
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 9, 2026. How we research →