Executive Order 14292: Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research

President: Donald J. Trump

Paused specified dangerous gain-of-function funding and ordered replacement oversight, foreign-research restrictions and nucleic-acid screening policy.

Status: In effect. Is Executive Order 14292 still in effect? Yes. Executive Order 14292 remains in effect. See Federal Register record.

Laboratory equipment, a DNA strand, a lock and a biohazard shield surround a research-policy document.
Biological-research oversight, illustrated symbolically; not a real pathogen, verified laboratory incident or finding that all research is prohibited. EO Explained · site-generated editorial illustration · not documentary evidence.

What does Executive Order 14292 do?

The text directs Funding agencies to pause prohibited or concerning research, and OSTP and agencies to replace oversight and screening policies.

Administration position: The order’s findings and policy rationale are administration positions. This guide distinguishes those claims from official implementation and judicial records.

Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14292

EO 14292 pauses specified federally funded research that the administration classifies as dangerous gain-of-function research and directs agencies to create replacement oversight policies. It also addresses foreign research funding and nucleic-acid screening. The order’s assignments are set out in the Federal Register text of EO 14292. It operates through federal funding and agency oversight; it is not a general criminal prohibition on every privately funded biological experiment.

Gain-of-function is a broad scientific term, and the order uses a defined policy scope for the research it covers. Agencies must identify affected awards, communicate funding conditions and determine whether work can proceed under any exception. A pause on federal support can alter project timelines, but it does not itself resolve a scientific question about risk or benefit. Researchers and institutions need the actual agency notice and grant terms to know what work is restricted.

The order also calls for oversight of certain research performed abroad with federal support and screening of synthetic nucleic-acid orders. Those issues involve different mechanisms: grant conditions, institutional review, vendor screening and federal reporting. Any replacement framework must specify covered experiments, risk review, exceptions and accountability. A public-health or security goal does not remove the need for clear standards and fair grant administration. Implementation can be tracked through agency guidance, award decisions and published oversight rules.

SignedMay 5, 2025
Lead officialsOSTP, HHS/NIH and all research-funding agencies
Express timing90-, 120- and 180-day actions

Before and after

Before the order

Federal life-sciences oversight used the 2024 DURC/PEPP policy and earlier nucleic-acid screening framework.

After the order

NIH paused flagged projects in 2025; the government issued its Policy for Stopping High-Risk Life Sciences Research on July 28, 2026, with agency guidance and review bodies still being established.

Who had to do what

Agency / officeActionTiming / position
Funding agenciesPause prohibited or concerning researchImmediate / continuing
OSTP and agenciesReplace oversight and screening policiesImplemented in stages
HHS/NIHIssue implementation guidance120 days from Jul 2026 policy

What happened next

EO 14292 signed.

NIH announced an implementation pause.

NIH expanded suspension guidance.

Government-wide high-risk research policy issued.