Executive Order 14254: Combating Unfair Practices in the Live Entertainment Market
President: Donald J. Trump
Directed the FTC and Attorney General to enforce competition and consumer-protection law against ticketing abuses, review BOTS Act enforcement and address price transparency and scalping.
Status: In effect.
Is Executive Order 14254 still in effect? Yes. Active; FTC and DOJ enforcement and policy review.

What does Executive Order 14254 do?
The trade commission and Justice were assigned ticketing enforcement and a later report under existing competition and consumer laws.
Later primary evidence reviewed September 24, 2026: Justice and the FTC opened a public inquiry for the report and recommendations directed by this order; the inquiry did not itself change ticketing law. Official source. The cited steps do not establish every downstream effect.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14254
EO 14254 tells the Federal Trade Commission and Attorney General to use existing consumer-protection and antitrust laws to address practices in live-event ticket sales. It calls for attention to ticket bots, deceptive pricing, resale and fee transparency, and asks the agencies to review enforcement of the Better Online Ticket Sales Act. The Federal Register text of EO 14254 assigns agency work; it does not itself set a nationwide ticket-price cap or create a new private right to sue.
The FTC and DOJ have different tools. The FTC may investigate unfair or deceptive practices and enforce consumer-protection statutes, while DOJ may bring antitrust cases under federal competition laws. The order directs prioritization and coordination, but an investigation is not a finding of liability. A case still requires evidence, a legal theory and the applicable process. Similarly, a rule about disclosure must be adopted under the agency’s statutory authority and follow required procedures before it binds sellers.
Ticket prices can include face value, mandatory fees, taxes, resale markups and optional add-ons. Transparency rules can help buyers compare the total cost, while anti-bot enforcement targets automated purchasing that violates the relevant law. The order does not make every resale markup illegal, and it does not determine that a particular ticket seller violated federal law. To assess its impact, examine later FTC rules, enforcement complaints, settlements or court judgments, and distinguish those from the order’s original instruction to focus agency attention on the market.
Before and after
Before the order
Ticketing was governed by antitrust, consumer-protection, state resale law and the federal BOTS Act.
After the order
The order prioritized enforcement and recommendations; it did not itself set ticket prices, ban all resale or decide pending antitrust cases.
Justice and the FTC opened a public inquiry for the report and recommendations directed by this order; the inquiry did not itself change ticketing law.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| FTC | Enforce unfair-practices and BOTS Act authorities | Ongoing |
| Attorney General | Coordinate competition enforcement | Ongoing |
| FTC and DOJ | Report on actions and recommendations | Within 180 days |
What happened next
EO 14254 signed.
The 180-day reporting deadline passed.
Later primary evidence reviewed: Justice and the FTC opened a public inquiry for the report and recommendations directed by this order; the inquiry did not itself change ticketing law.
Legal and source detail
How it works legally
The FTC Act, Sherman Act, Clayton Act and BOTS Act supply the legal authority. Penalties, rules and case outcomes require ordinary statutory process and judicial review.
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
- www.justice.gov (opens in a new tab) Official record
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 24, 2026. How we research →