Executive Order 14147: Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government
President: Donald J. Trump
Directed the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence to review specified federal enforcement and intelligence activities during the preceding four years and recommend remedial action.
Status: In effect.
Is Executive Order 14147 still in effect? Yes. Active; departmental reviews and follow-up activity.

What does Executive Order 14147 do?
This order set an executive-branch policy against using federal law-enforcement or intelligence powers for political purposes. It instructed the Attorney General to review civil and criminal enforcement activity, and the Director of National Intelligence to review Intelligence Community activity, during the preceding four years. Each was to report findings and recommendations to the President. The order did not set a completion date and did not itself decide that any person or agency had broken the law.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14147
Section 3 creates two parallel reviews rather than one investigation with a single decision-maker. The Attorney General reviews civil and criminal enforcement across federal departments and agencies, with the order naming the Justice Department, Securities and Exchange Commission, and Federal Trade Commission as examples. The Director of National Intelligence separately reviews Intelligence Community activity, using the statutory definition in 50 U.S.C. § 3003. Each official sends recommendations to the President through a different White House route; the order sets no deadline for either report.
The order also directs departments to follow document-retention rules and send possible legal or retention violations to the Attorney General. That instruction concerns preserving and reviewing records; it does not itself establish that a violation occurred. The Federal Register text preserves agency authority, requires lawful implementation within available appropriations, and disclaims a private right to sue under the order. Those limits matter when separating an administration’s stated rationale from evidence, a later enforcement decision, or a court’s finding. Read Executive Order 14147 in the Federal Register.
Before and after
Before the order
Federal enforcement and intelligence agencies were already bound by the Constitution, statutes, regulations and their own investigative standards.
There was no government-wide presidential direction in force requiring the two retrospective reviews described in this order.
After the order
The Attorney General must coordinate a review of departments and agencies exercising civil or criminal enforcement authority and recommend appropriate remedies.
The Director of National Intelligence must conduct a parallel review of Intelligence Community activity. DOJ later cited EO 14147 when its Weaponization Working Group released a report concerning the FBI Richmond field-office memorandum.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| Attorney General | Review relevant civil and criminal enforcement activity and report recommendations to the President | No express deadline |
| Director of National Intelligence | Review Intelligence Community activity and report recommendations to the President | No express deadline |
| Relevant departments and agencies | Consult and provide material for the reviews | As requested |
What happened next
EO 14147 signed and its review directions took effect.
Order published in the Federal Register.
DOJ’s Weaponization Working Group released a report on the FBI Richmond memorandum and identified EO 14147 as its authority.
Legal and source detail
How it works legally
The order governs executive-branch review and policy. It says implementation must remain consistent with existing law and expressly disclaims creation of an enforceable private right or benefit. A finding in an executive-branch report is not, by itself, a criminal conviction, civil judgment or court ruling.
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 15, 2026. How we research →