Executive Order 14365: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence

President: Donald J. Trump

Directed a federal challenge to certain state AI laws and development of a proposed national AI framework.

Status: In effect.

Is Executive Order 14365 still in effect? Yes. Active federal policy direction; state pre-emption requires valid federal authority.

Illustration of an AI circuit symbol, a federal order and connected points on a globe
A conceptual federal AI-policy scene, not enacted legislation or a ruling that every state AI law is preempted. EO Explained · site-generated editorial illustration · not documentary evidence.

What does Executive Order 14365 do?

The Attorney General was to establish an AI Litigation Task Force within 30 days. Commerce was to assess state AI laws, agencies were to consider grant conditions, and advisers were to prepare a legislative recommendation, all within legal limits.

Later official evidence reviewed September 26, 2026: The Attorney General established an AI Litigation Task Force by memorandum on January 9, 2026 as directed. The memo alone does not establish successful challenges to state laws or enactment of a national AI framework.

Administration position: The title, findings and policy rationale express the administration position. They are attributed here rather than treated as independent evidence that every stated problem, benefit or outcome has been established.

Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14365

EO 14365 directs the Attorney General to create an AI Litigation Task Force to challenge certain state AI laws and directs federal agencies to develop a proposed national AI policy framework. The Federal Register text creates executive-branch assignments; it does not itself invalidate a state law or establish a comprehensive federal AI statute.

State AI laws remain in force unless a court blocks them, a state changes them or Congress enacts a preemptive federal law. The Attorney General must identify a legal basis for any challenge, such as conflict with federal law or a constitutional limit. A task force may recommend litigation, but a court decides whether a particular state requirement is preempted or otherwise invalid.

The framework work is separate from litigation. Federal agencies can recommend common principles, but binding rules depend on statutes and agency authority. State governments continue to regulate within their powers, and federal programs may have their own requirements. The White House AI Action Plan cited on this page is policy context, not a substitute for the order or a law passed by Congress. Readers should distinguish a proposed framework, a filed lawsuit and a final judgment.

SignedDecember 11, 2025
PublishedDecember 16, 2025
IssuerPresident Donald J. Trump
TermSecond presidential term

What happened after

Verified actions after the order

The Attorney General established an AI Litigation Task Force by memorandum on January 9, 2026 as directed. The memo alone does not establish successful challenges to state laws or enactment of a national AI framework.

Who had to do what

Agency / officeActionTiming / position
PresidentIssued the executive order and stated the administration policyDecember 11, 2025
Named departments and officialsCarry out the directions, reviews and reports specified in the orderAccording to the deadlines in the primary text
Office of the Federal RegisterAssigned the EO number and published the signed documentDecember 16, 2025

What happened next

Executive Order 14365 signed.

Order published in the Federal Register.

Reviewed court position

Court status

See the court documents in Sources by type.