Executive Order 14365: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
President: Donald J. Trump
Directed a federal challenge to certain state AI laws and development of a proposed national AI framework.
Status: In effect.
Is Executive Order 14365 still in effect? Yes. Active federal policy direction; state pre-emption requires valid federal authority.

What does Executive Order 14365 do?
The Attorney General was to establish an AI Litigation Task Force within 30 days. Commerce was to assess state AI laws, agencies were to consider grant conditions, and advisers were to prepare a legislative recommendation, all within legal limits.
Later official evidence reviewed September 26, 2026: The Attorney General established an AI Litigation Task Force by memorandum on January 9, 2026 as directed. The memo alone does not establish successful challenges to state laws or enactment of a national AI framework.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14365
EO 14365 directs the Attorney General to create an AI Litigation Task Force to challenge certain state AI laws and directs federal agencies to develop a proposed national AI policy framework. The Federal Register text creates executive-branch assignments; it does not itself invalidate a state law or establish a comprehensive federal AI statute.
State AI laws remain in force unless a court blocks them, a state changes them or Congress enacts a preemptive federal law. The Attorney General must identify a legal basis for any challenge, such as conflict with federal law or a constitutional limit. A task force may recommend litigation, but a court decides whether a particular state requirement is preempted or otherwise invalid.
The framework work is separate from litigation. Federal agencies can recommend common principles, but binding rules depend on statutes and agency authority. State governments continue to regulate within their powers, and federal programs may have their own requirements. The White House AI Action Plan cited on this page is policy context, not a substitute for the order or a law passed by Congress. Readers should distinguish a proposed framework, a filed lawsuit and a final judgment.
What happened after
Verified actions after the order
The Attorney General established an AI Litigation Task Force by memorandum on January 9, 2026 as directed. The memo alone does not establish successful challenges to state laws or enactment of a national AI framework.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| President | Issued the executive order and stated the administration policy | December 11, 2025 |
| Named departments and officials | Carry out the directions, reviews and reports specified in the order | According to the deadlines in the primary text |
| Office of the Federal Register | Assigned the EO number and published the signed document | December 16, 2025 |
What happened next
Executive Order 14365 signed.
Order published in the Federal Register.
Court status
See the court documents in Sources by type.
Legal and source detail
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
- White House — America’s AI Action Plan (opens in a new tab) Official record
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 26, 2026. How we research →