Executive Order 14370: Increasing Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research
President: Donald J. Trump
Directed faster marijuana scheduling review, expanded real-world evidence and lawful research and access work concerning cannabis and hemp-derived cannabidiol.
Status: In effect. Is Executive Order 14370 still in effect? Yes. Executive Order 14370 remains in effect. See Federal Register record.

What does Executive Order 14370 do?
The text directs HHS and NIH to develop real-world-evidence and research models, and FDA to clarify lawful research and enforcement approach.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14370
EO 14370 directs agencies to review marijuana scheduling, expand research using real-world evidence and improve lawful research access involving cannabis and cannabidiol. The Federal Register text of EO 14370 sets agency assignments; it does not itself move marijuana to a new schedule or legalize possession under federal law.
Marijuana remains subject to the Controlled Substances Act unless and until the Attorney General completes the rescheduling process under that statute. Rescheduling can change regulatory controls but does not automatically approve cannabis products as medicines or remove state-law conflicts. FDA approval, DEA registration and state licensing are separate questions. Researchers need the appropriate federal permissions and must follow human-subject and product-safety requirements.
Real-world evidence may help agencies understand patterns of use and outcomes, but observational data can be incomplete or confounded. It does not replace controlled trials where those are required to establish safety and efficacy. Agencies must also protect health information and ensure that research methods are transparent. The order’s goal is to facilitate lawful study and review; the effect should be measured through agency decisions, research access and published evidence rather than assumptions that the law changed on signing.
The order also asks agencies to improve lawful research access and examine cannabidiol products derived from hemp. Hemp and marijuana are treated differently under federal law, but individual products can raise separate questions involving THC content, drug approval and advertising claims. Researchers must identify the product being studied, the applicable schedule and the agency permission required. This specificity is important because “cannabis research” covers substances with different legal and pharmacological profiles.
Before and after
Before the order
Marijuana research faced Schedule I controls, FDA drug requirements and limited evidence; most ingestible CBD products lacked a general lawful food or supplement pathway.
After the order
FDA described a limited enforcement posture for qualifying physician-directed Medicare-related CBD access while agencies developed research models; product safety and approval law still applies.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| HHS and NIH | Develop real-world-evidence and research models | Ongoing |
| FDA | Clarify lawful research and enforcement approach | Implemented in part |
| Attorney General | Complete scheduling action under the Controlled Substances Act | Separate process |
What happened next
EO 14370 signed.
Legal and source detail
How it works legally
The Controlled Substances Act scheduling process, FDCA, Social Security Act, clinical-research protections and state law remain. The order does not approve marijuana or CBD as a treatment.
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
- FDA implementation letter (opens in a new tab) Official record
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 9, 2026. How we research →