Executive Order 14161: Protecting the United States From Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats
President: Donald J. Trump
Directed enhanced screening and vetting for visa applicants and people seeking admission, plus a 60-day country-by-country review of information-sharing and security risks.
Status: In effect.
Is Executive Order 14161 still in effect? Yes. Active; vetting framework implemented through later actions.

What does Executive Order 14161 do?
Directed enhanced screening and vetting for visa applicants and people seeking admission, plus a 60-day country-by-country review of information-sharing and security risks.
Later primary evidence reviewed September 24, 2026: A later presidential entry-restrictions order expressly relied on the national-security review directed by this order. Official source. The cited steps do not establish every downstream effect.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14161
The order uses a country-by-country review rather than naming a final list in its text. State, DHS, DOJ, and the Director of National Intelligence were assigned to identify where identity information or cooperation was inadequate and recommend whether entry restrictions were warranted. The 60-day report was a recommendation stage. Proclamation 10949, issued later, was the separate presidential action that imposed restrictions on named countries and specified categories of travelers.
The order also directed stronger screening and vetting across visa and admission processes. That direction does not cancel a visa already issued by itself or decide an individual’s admissibility without the applicable immigration process. State and DHS still apply statutory grounds, exceptions, waivers, and consular procedures to individual cases. Later entry restrictions citing the review show how the policy was carried forward, but the proclamation—not the earlier study order—sets the operative country list and scope. Read Executive Order 14161 in the Federal Register.
A 60-day review is an information-gathering step, not an entry ban. State, DHS, DOJ, and intelligence officials were asked to evaluate identity systems, document reliability, and cooperation from foreign governments, then recommend country-specific responses. Proclamation 10949 is the follow-on instrument that sets restrictions and exceptions. When comparing the EO with that proclamation, check who is covered, whether a visa type is exempt, and whether a waiver is available; those details come from the later proclamation and its implementation, not from the review order alone.
Before and after
Before the order
Existing immigration law already required identity, security and admissibility screening.
Country-specific restrictions from the first Trump administration were no longer the operative presidential framework.
After the order
Agencies were directed to strengthen vetting standards, review countries and evaluate visa programs.
Later proclamations imposed country-specific entry restrictions under separate authority.
A later presidential entry-restrictions order expressly relied on the national-security review directed by this order.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| State and DHS | Establish enhanced vetting standards | Immediate and continuing |
| State, DHS, DOJ and DNI | Identify countries with deficient information and recommend restrictions | Within 60 days |
| State and DHS | Review visa programs and assimilation-related screening | Ongoing |
What happened next
EO 14161 signed.
Sixty-day country-report deadline.
Proclamation 10949 imposed entry restrictions following the review.
Later primary evidence reviewed: A later presidential entry-restrictions order expressly relied on the national-security review directed by this order.
Legal and source detail
How it works legally
The order directs executive screening within immigration law. It does not itself make every noncitizen inadmissible, and later restrictions contain their own scope, exceptions and effective dates.
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 24, 2026. How we research →