Executive Order 14408: Removing Unnecessary and Counterproductive Restrictions on Access to Federal Lands

President: Donald J. Trump

Directed land-management agencies to review restrictions on recreation, grazing, energy, timber and other lawful uses of federal lands and streamline permits.

Status: In effect.

Is Executive Order 14408 still in effect? Yes. Active; access, permit and land-plan reviews underway.

An open gate leading to mountains and a lake beside administrative barriers
Review of federal-land access restrictions, illustrated conceptually; not universal access to every site or cancellation of safety, conservation and permit rules. EO Explained · site-generated editorial illustration · not documentary evidence.

What does Executive Order 14408 do?

The text directs Interior and Agriculture to inventory and review access restrictions, and Land agencies to streamline lawful permits and revise plans where warranted.

Administration position: The order’s findings and policy rationale are administration positions. This guide distinguishes those claims from official implementation and judicial records.

Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14408

EO 14408 directs land-management agencies to review restrictions on recreation, grazing, energy, timber and other lawful uses of federal lands and to streamline permits where appropriate. It asks agencies to identify unnecessary barriers and consider revisions to plans or procedures. The Federal Register text starts a review; it does not automatically open every closed area or create a right to use a specific parcel.

Federal lands are managed under different statutes and plans. A national park, wildlife refuge, national forest and Bureau of Land Management tract can have different purposes and permitted uses. Agencies must continue to protect wildlife, cultural resources, public safety and tribal interests while applying environmental and permitting laws. A direction to streamline a process does not eliminate the substantive criteria for a permit or lease.

Access restrictions can reflect seasonal closures, habitat protection, fire risk or resource limits. Reviewing a restriction can lead to continued closure, a modified permit or expanded use depending on evidence and law. To understand what changed, identify the land manager, parcel, decision and public record. The order’s broad access policy should not be mistaken for a site-specific authorization.

Federal-land agencies should explain the reason for a restriction, the resource or safety concern it addresses and the evidence considered when reviewing it. Public notice and consultation can identify impacts on recreation, local economies and tribal uses. If an agency changes a permit or land-use plan, it must still document compliance with applicable environmental and cultural-resource laws. This makes streamlined access decisions reviewable rather than automatic.

SignedMay 29, 2026
Lead officialsInterior and Agriculture Secretaries
Express timing30-, 90-, 120- and 180-day reviews

Before and after

Before the order

Federal land access followed resource-management plans, permits, closures and environmental and species protections under multiple statutes.

After the order

Agencies were directed to reconsider restrictions, but site-specific access and development still require lawful plans, permits and environmental review.

Federal Register, agency, amendment, revocation and court sources were searched through September 15, 2026. No revocation or material order-specific final court ruling was located; interior and agriculture restriction, permit and plan reviews underway.

Who had to do what

Agency / officeActionTiming / position
Interior and AgricultureInventory and review access restrictions90 days
Land agenciesStreamline lawful permits and revise plans where warrantedOngoing
AgenciesConsult states, tribes and local communitiesProject-specific

What happened next

EO 14408 signed.