Executive Order 14408: Removing Unnecessary and Counterproductive Restrictions on Access to Federal Lands
President: Donald J. Trump
Directed land-management agencies to review restrictions on recreation, grazing, energy, timber and other lawful uses of federal lands and streamline permits.
Status: In effect.
Is Executive Order 14408 still in effect? Yes. Active; access, permit and land-plan reviews underway.

What does Executive Order 14408 do?
The text directs Interior and Agriculture to inventory and review access restrictions, and Land agencies to streamline lawful permits and revise plans where warranted.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14408
EO 14408 directs land-management agencies to review restrictions on recreation, grazing, energy, timber and other lawful uses of federal lands and to streamline permits where appropriate. It asks agencies to identify unnecessary barriers and consider revisions to plans or procedures. The Federal Register text starts a review; it does not automatically open every closed area or create a right to use a specific parcel.
Federal lands are managed under different statutes and plans. A national park, wildlife refuge, national forest and Bureau of Land Management tract can have different purposes and permitted uses. Agencies must continue to protect wildlife, cultural resources, public safety and tribal interests while applying environmental and permitting laws. A direction to streamline a process does not eliminate the substantive criteria for a permit or lease.
Access restrictions can reflect seasonal closures, habitat protection, fire risk or resource limits. Reviewing a restriction can lead to continued closure, a modified permit or expanded use depending on evidence and law. To understand what changed, identify the land manager, parcel, decision and public record. The order’s broad access policy should not be mistaken for a site-specific authorization.
Federal-land agencies should explain the reason for a restriction, the resource or safety concern it addresses and the evidence considered when reviewing it. Public notice and consultation can identify impacts on recreation, local economies and tribal uses. If an agency changes a permit or land-use plan, it must still document compliance with applicable environmental and cultural-resource laws. This makes streamlined access decisions reviewable rather than automatic.
Before and after
Before the order
Federal land access followed resource-management plans, permits, closures and environmental and species protections under multiple statutes.
After the order
Agencies were directed to reconsider restrictions, but site-specific access and development still require lawful plans, permits and environmental review.
Federal Register, agency, amendment, revocation and court sources were searched through September 15, 2026. No revocation or material order-specific final court ruling was located; interior and agriculture restriction, permit and plan reviews underway.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| Interior and Agriculture | Inventory and review access restrictions | 90 days |
| Land agencies | Streamline lawful permits and revise plans where warranted | Ongoing |
| Agencies | Consult states, tribes and local communities | Project-specific |
What happened next
EO 14408 signed.
Legal and source detail
How it works legally
FLPMA, National Forest Management Act, NEPA, Endangered Species Act, Antiquities Act, treaty and tribal rights, mineral and recreation statutes remain.
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
- BLM — Planning and NEPA (opens in a new tab) Official record
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 15, 2026. How we research →