Executive Order 14269: Restoring America's Maritime Dominance

President: Donald J. Trump

Directed development of a Maritime Action Plan covering shipbuilding, finance, workforce, ports, procurement, trade enforcement and allied cooperation.

Status: In effect. Is Executive Order 14269 still in effect? Yes. Executive Order 14269 remains in effect. See Federal Register record.

A document rises above ships, port cranes, ocean waves and a map of international routes.
Maritime policy and planning, illustrated conceptually; not a completed fleet expansion, funded project or verified trade route. EO Explained · site-generated editorial illustration · not documentary evidence.

What does Executive Order 14269 do?

Agencies had to prepare a maritime plan, while trade, transportation and defense officials reviewed their own statutory tools.

Administration position: The order’s evaluative language and policy rationale are administration positions. This guide distinguishes them from official acts, reports and judgments.

Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14269

EO 14269 directs the administration to prepare a Maritime Action Plan covering shipbuilding, workforce, ports, financing, procurement, trade enforcement and cooperation with allies. It frames maritime capacity as an economic and national-security concern and assigns work across several departments. The order’s planning assignment is set out in the Federal Register publication of EO 14269. A plan can set priorities, but it is not itself a funded shipyard expansion or a new shipping law.

Maritime capability depends on more than the number of vessels. Shipyards require specialized labor, suppliers, dry docks and predictable orders; ports need infrastructure and trained workers; shipping policy also interacts with laws governing domestic coastal trade and international commerce. The order asks agencies to assess these connected parts of the system. Any proposed loan, grant, procurement or regulatory change must still be supported by the authority and appropriation applicable to that tool.

The plan should be read as a roadmap whose recommendations need separate implementation. Evidence of execution could include a funded shipbuilding contract, a workforce program, a port project, a financing decision or a final rule. Statements about restoring dominance are policy claims unless measured against fleet capacity, shipyard output, delivery schedules and workforce data. This distinction lets readers see what the order asked agencies to plan and what later government records establish they actually did.

The plan’s publication is a milestone, not proof that every recommendation has been funded. Congress may need to appropriate money for large infrastructure or shipbuilding initiatives, and private operators make investment decisions based on demand and financing. Agencies can begin work within existing programs, but each action should be tied to a budget, authority and measurable delivery target. This makes later claims about maritime capacity possible to verify.

SignedApril 9, 2025
Lead officialsNational Security Adviser, Commerce, Transportation, Defense and USTR
Express timing90-, 180- and 210-day actions

Before and after

Before the order

US maritime policy was spread across cargo-preference, Jones Act, defense, port, trade and financing programs.

After the order

Agencies developed the plan and aligned later grant and procurement activity with it; major funding, tax or statutory reforms depend on Congress.

Who had to do what

Agency / officeActionTiming / position
White House and agenciesPrepare the Maritime Action Plan210 days
USTRAddress unfair trade practicesOngoing
Transportation and DefenseReview grants, procurement and workforce tools90 and 180 days

What happened next

EO 14269 signed.

MARAD announced interagency plan work.