Executive Order 14275: Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement
President: Donald J. Trump
Directed a comprehensive rewrite of the Federal Acquisition Regulation around statutory and essential requirements and review of agency supplements.
Status: In effect. Is Executive Order 14275 still in effect? Yes. Executive Order 14275 remains in effect. See Federal Register record.

What does Executive Order 14275 do?
The acquisition council was assigned a rewrite, while agencies reviewed their supplements and OMB oversaw implementation.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14275
EO 14275 directs a broad rewrite of the Federal Acquisition Regulation and review of agency-specific supplements. The order tells the FAR Council to focus on requirements grounded in statute or essential to sound procurement, with the goal of simplifying and clarifying the rules. The Federal Register text of EO 14275 starts a rulemaking and policy review; it does not make all current clauses disappear on the date of signing.
The FAR is a government-wide regulation used by contracting officers and vendors. A rewrite may affect solicitation language, representations, contract administration and compliance costs, so the transition requires publication of changes and clear effective dates. Agencies also use supplements to address mission-specific needs, such as defense or civilian technology procurement. Reviewing a supplement does not automatically repeal it; changes must be issued through the appropriate agency process and remain consistent with the FAR and governing statutes.
Congress has imposed procurement requirements involving competition, labor standards, cybersecurity, small-business participation and domestic sourcing. An executive directive cannot remove a statutory requirement simply by labeling it nonessential. The FAR Council must distinguish discretionary regulatory text from rules that implement a law. Vendors should rely on the solicitation and contract clauses in force for a specific procurement, not assume that a proposed rewrite has already changed their obligations. Implementation can be measured by published FAR cases, final amendments and agency supplements.
A solicitation issued before a FAR amendment may continue under its existing terms, while a later procurement may use revised clauses. Contracting officers and vendors need clear transition instructions to know which version governs. If an agency supplement conflicts with a government-wide rule, the conflict must be addressed through the prescribed process rather than informally ignored. These details make the rewrite practical for ongoing procurements.
Before and after
Before the order
The FAR contained government-wide procurement rules accumulated over four decades, with additional agency supplements.
After the order
OMB issued M-25-26 and the FAR Council released model deviation text across FAR parts while formal rulemaking and agency supplement work continued.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| FAR Council | Rewrite the FAR in plain language | 180 days |
| Agency heads | Review and reduce supplements | 15 months |
| OMB | Issue guidance and oversee implementation | Completed / ongoing |
What happened next
EO 14275 signed.
OMB issued M-25-26.
Legal and source detail
How it works legally
Statutory procurement, competition, labor, socioeconomic and security requirements remain. Deviations apply only within lawful authority and formal FAR changes require rulemaking.
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
- Acquisition.gov FAR overhaul FAQs (opens in a new tab) Official record
- OMB M-25-26 (opens in a new tab) Official record
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 9, 2026. How we research →