Executive Order 14275: Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement

President: Donald J. Trump

Directed a comprehensive rewrite of the Federal Acquisition Regulation around statutory and essential requirements and review of agency supplements.

Status: In effect. Is Executive Order 14275 still in effect? Yes. Executive Order 14275 remains in effect. See Federal Register record.

Tangled paperwork leads toward a policy document, purchasing symbols and a compass between government buildings.
Procurement-rule review, illustrated symbolically; not proof that every acquisition rule was replaced or that a purchase is exempt from law. EO Explained · site-generated editorial illustration · not documentary evidence.

What does Executive Order 14275 do?

The acquisition council was assigned a rewrite, while agencies reviewed their supplements and OMB oversaw implementation.

Administration position: The order’s evaluative language and policy rationale are administration positions. This guide distinguishes them from official acts, reports and judgments.

Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14275

EO 14275 directs a broad rewrite of the Federal Acquisition Regulation and review of agency-specific supplements. The order tells the FAR Council to focus on requirements grounded in statute or essential to sound procurement, with the goal of simplifying and clarifying the rules. The Federal Register text of EO 14275 starts a rulemaking and policy review; it does not make all current clauses disappear on the date of signing.

The FAR is a government-wide regulation used by contracting officers and vendors. A rewrite may affect solicitation language, representations, contract administration and compliance costs, so the transition requires publication of changes and clear effective dates. Agencies also use supplements to address mission-specific needs, such as defense or civilian technology procurement. Reviewing a supplement does not automatically repeal it; changes must be issued through the appropriate agency process and remain consistent with the FAR and governing statutes.

Congress has imposed procurement requirements involving competition, labor standards, cybersecurity, small-business participation and domestic sourcing. An executive directive cannot remove a statutory requirement simply by labeling it nonessential. The FAR Council must distinguish discretionary regulatory text from rules that implement a law. Vendors should rely on the solicitation and contract clauses in force for a specific procurement, not assume that a proposed rewrite has already changed their obligations. Implementation can be measured by published FAR cases, final amendments and agency supplements.

A solicitation issued before a FAR amendment may continue under its existing terms, while a later procurement may use revised clauses. Contracting officers and vendors need clear transition instructions to know which version governs. If an agency supplement conflicts with a government-wide rule, the conflict must be addressed through the prescribed process rather than informally ignored. These details make the rewrite practical for ongoing procurements.

SignedApril 15, 2025
Lead officialsOMB/OFPP, FAR Council and agency heads
Express timing180-day FAR rewrite; 15-month supplement review

Before and after

Before the order

The FAR contained government-wide procurement rules accumulated over four decades, with additional agency supplements.

After the order

OMB issued M-25-26 and the FAR Council released model deviation text across FAR parts while formal rulemaking and agency supplement work continued.

Who had to do what

Agency / officeActionTiming / position
FAR CouncilRewrite the FAR in plain language180 days
Agency headsReview and reduce supplements15 months
OMBIssue guidance and oversee implementationCompleted / ongoing

What happened next

EO 14275 signed.

OMB issued M-25-26.