Executive Order 14334: Further Modifying Reciprocal Tariff Rates To Reflect Ongoing Discussions With the People's Republic of China
President: Donald J. Trump
Extended the temporary China reciprocal-tariff arrangement while negotiations continued.
Status: Struck down. Sources: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, Supreme Court opinion, February 20, 2026 · Executive Order 14389, February 20, 2026, sections 1–2 · Executive Order 14334, signed text.
Is Executive Order 14334 still in effect? No. The Supreme Court rejected IEEPA tariffs in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump on February 20, 2026; EO 14389 ended those duties the same day. Its changes to the IEEPA duties under EO 14257 no longer provide an operative tariff rate.

What does Executive Order 14334 do?
This action formed part of the 2025–2026 tariff framework. On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court held that IEEPA does not authorize presidential tariffs; EO 14389 then ended the additional ad valorem duties imposed under the listed IEEPA orders. Measures based on other statutes and the all-country de minimis suspension require separate analysis.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14334
EO 14334 extended a temporary modification of reciprocal tariff rates on Chinese imports while U.S.–China discussions continued. It preserved specified rates and conditions for a limited period rather than making a permanent change to the tariff schedule. The Federal Register text of EO 14334 supplies the effective dates and rate structure. The order is completed or expired now, so its historic rates should not be applied to current entries without checking later actions.
Tariffs are assessed by product classification, country of origin and date of entry. A temporary reciprocal rate can overlap with other duties, including product-specific measures, and an extension may preserve only part of the prior arrangement. Importers need customs guidance and the legal text to determine which rate applied to a shipment at the time it entered the United States.
Later presidential tariff actions and the 2026 IEEPA litigation changed the legal and policy framework. EO 14334 remains evidence of a temporary negotiating period, but it does not determine today’s rate. The order’s expiration and any later court ruling are separate events: an expired rate ends on its stated schedule, while a judgment may address the validity of the authority. Current customs entries must be evaluated under the rules effective on their date.
Before and after
Before the order
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule reflected the then-current reciprocal, country-specific and product-specific treatment.
Earlier orders in the same lineage supplied the baseline that this order amended.
After the order
EO 14358 later implemented another China trade arrangement.
EO 14389 ended the listed IEEPA additional ad valorem duties after the Supreme Court decision. It expressly preserved non-IEEPA duties and the separate all-country de minimis suspension.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| DHS and USTR | Implement the stated tariff or customs change through the Harmonized Tariff Schedule and entry system | Through November 10, 2025 |
| Commerce, Homeland Security and USTR | Coordinate implementation and later modifications | As directed |
What happened next
EO 14334 signed.
Supreme Court held that IEEPA does not authorize presidential tariffs; EO 14389 ended the listed IEEPA duties.
A separate temporary section 122 surcharge operated under the Trade Act.
Current position checked against the judgment and later presidential action.
Court status
See the court documents in Sources by type.
Legal and source detail
How it works legally
Learning Resources v. Trump held that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. EO 14389 ended the identified IEEPA duties but preserved the underlying emergencies and non-tariff actions. Section 232, section 301, section 122 and customs-law measures stand or fall on their own authority.
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 9, 2026. How we research →