Executive Order 14358: Modifying Reciprocal Tariff Rates Consistent With the Economic and Trade Arrangement Between the United States and the People's Republic of China
President: Donald J. Trump
Modified China reciprocal rates and extended exclusions to implement a bilateral economic and trade arrangement.
Status: Partly revoked. Sources: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, Supreme Court opinion, February 20, 2026 · Executive Order 14389, February 20, 2026, sections 1–2 · Executive Order 14358, signed text.
Is Executive Order 14358 still in effect? Partly. The Supreme Court rejected IEEPA tariffs in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump on February 20, 2026; EO 14389 ended those duties the same day. Section 3’s trade-emergency monitoring and recommendations survive; the IEEPA tariff provisions no longer operate.
What does Executive Order 14358 do?
This action formed part of the 2025–2026 tariff framework. On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court held that IEEPA does not authorize presidential tariffs; EO 14389 then ended the additional ad valorem duties imposed under the listed IEEPA orders. Measures based on other statutes and the all-country de minimis suspension require separate analysis.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14358
EO 14358 modified reciprocal tariff rates and extended specified exclusions as part of an economic and trade arrangement with China. It implemented agreed changes through U.S. customs instructions and set the duration of the adjustment. The Federal Register text of EO 14358 is the source for covered goods, rates and dates.
Tariff exclusions are product-specific and may depend on a precise classification or an annex. They should not be generalized to all imports from China. Importers need to track the effective period and any later amendment, since an exclusion may expire even while a broader trade arrangement remains under discussion. Customs treatment also can include other statutory duties that the order did not remove.
The temporary reciprocal-rate changes have expired, and the order’s status is completed or expired. Later presidential actions and the 2026 IEEPA decision must be read separately. A negotiated arrangement can continue to shape diplomacy even after a tariff provision expires, but customs officials apply the legal rate in force on the entry date. This distinction keeps the trade-policy history separate from current duty calculations.
Before and after
Before the order
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule reflected the then-current reciprocal, country-specific and product-specific treatment.
Earlier orders in the same lineage supplied the baseline that this order amended.
After the order
The measure amended the EO 14257 lineage later ended by EO 14389.
EO 14389 ended the listed IEEPA additional ad valorem duties after the Supreme Court decision. It expressly preserved non-IEEPA duties and the separate all-country de minimis suspension.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| DHS and USTR | Implement the stated tariff or customs change through the Harmonized Tariff Schedule and entry system | November 10, 2025 and specified later dates |
| Commerce, Homeland Security and USTR | Coordinate implementation and later modifications | As directed |
What happened next
EO 14358 signed.
Supreme Court held that IEEPA does not authorize presidential tariffs; EO 14389 ended the listed IEEPA duties.
A separate temporary section 122 surcharge operated under the Trade Act.
Current position checked against the judgment and later presidential action.
Court status
See the court documents in Sources by type.
Legal and source detail
How it works legally
Learning Resources v. Trump held that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. EO 14389 ended the identified IEEPA duties but preserved the underlying emergencies and non-tariff actions. Section 232, section 301, section 122 and customs-law measures stand or fall on their own authority.
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 9, 2026. How we research →