Executive Order 14331: Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans
President: Donald J. Trump
Directed bank regulators to remove certain reputation-risk criteria and review alleged politically or religiously motivated debanking.
Status: In effect.
Is Executive Order 14331 still in effect? Yes. Active supervisory direction; bank safety-and-soundness and civil-rights laws remain applicable.

What does Executive Order 14331 do?
Regulators were to revise supervisory materials, review bank practices and consider remedies under applicable law; SBA was assigned notices concerning its lending programs.
Official records rechecked October 2, 2026: The FDIC and OCC final rule was published on April 10, 2026 and took effect on June 9. It bars the agencies from using reputation risk as a basis for specified supervisory actions; it does not impose requirements on banks’ own decisions. The rule responds to EO 14331 but does not prove that any particular bank engaged in misconduct.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14331
EO 14331 directs federal bank regulators to remove certain reputation-risk criteria from supervision and review allegations that banks denied services for political or religious reasons. It applies to agencies including the banking regulators and asks them to clarify permissible risk assessment. The Federal Register text of EO 14331 sets the review framework; it does not guarantee a bank account to every applicant or prohibit lawful risk controls.
Banks must comply with anti-money-laundering laws, sanctions, safety-and-soundness standards and consumer-protection requirements. Supervisory guidance can affect how examiners review a bank’s decision, but regulators must distinguish a customer’s lawful political or religious activity from documented financial or legal risk. A bank may still decline a relationship for legitimate reasons, subject to applicable law and contract terms.
The 2026 Federal Register rule cited on this page addresses the use of reputation risk by regulators and supplies later implementation evidence. A final rule has its own effective date and legal scope; it should be read alongside the order rather than treated as a blanket entitlement. If a person believes services were denied unlawfully, the relevant facts include the stated reason, communications, account history and regulator rules. The order asks for fair treatment while preserving legitimate safety and compliance decisions.
Before and after
Before the order
EO 14331's stated background describes politically sensitive transaction monitoring after January 6, 2021, and cites Operation Chokepoint as an example of regulator pressure on banks. Those are the order's stated rationale, not independent findings established by the order itself.
After the order
The FDIC and OCC final rule was published on April 10, 2026 and took effect on June 9. It bars the agencies from using reputation risk as a basis for specified supervisory actions; it does not impose requirements on banks’ own decisions. The rule responds to EO 14331 but does not prove that any particular bank engaged in misconduct.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| President | Issued the executive order and stated the administration policy | August 7, 2025 |
| Named departments and officials | Carry out the directions, reviews and reports specified in the order | According to the deadlines in the primary text |
| Office of the Federal Register | Assigned the EO number and published the signed document | August 12, 2025 |
What happened next
Executive Order 14331 signed.
Order published in the Federal Register.
Legal and source detail
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on October 2, 2026. How we research →