Executive Order 14260: Protecting American Energy From State Overreach

President: Donald J. Trump

Directed the Attorney General to identify and challenge state and local laws said to burden domestic energy or interstate commerce.

Status: In effect.

Is Executive Order 14260 still in effect? Yes. Active; federal review and litigation strategy directed.

A shield with energy symbols stands beside a U.S. map, policy document and barriers between state outlines.
Federal review of state energy measures, illustrated symbolically; not a ruling that every state law is preempted or an approval of a particular project. EO Explained · site-generated editorial illustration · not documentary evidence.

What does Executive Order 14260 do?

Justice had to identify state and local measures and decide whether lawful litigation was warranted in each case.

Later primary evidence reviewed September 24, 2026: Energy requested information on state energy laws as part of the review directed by this order. Official source. The cited steps do not establish every downstream effect.

Administration position: The order’s evaluative language and policy rationale are administration positions. This guide distinguishes them from official acts, reports and judgments.

Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14260

EO 14260 directs the Attorney General to identify state and local laws that the administration believes burden domestic energy development or interstate commerce, and to consider legal challenges. The order’s findings and assignments appear in the Federal Register text of EO 14260. Identifying a law for review does not invalidate it. A statute remains in force unless a court enjoins it, a legislature changes it or another valid legal rule displaces it.

Federalism questions are central. States traditionally regulate many areas of land use, utility planning, environmental protection and public health, while Congress can regulate interstate commerce and preempt conflicting state rules through federal law. A presidential order alone does not establish that a state measure is preempted. The Department of Justice would need a legal basis and a case presenting a justiciable dispute; a court would then decide whether the federal claim succeeds under the Constitution and statutes.

The order also raises a practical difference between an investigation and litigation. A review list can set DOJ priorities, but it does not itself change compliance obligations for an energy company or state agency. Any complaint, injunction or final judgment must be assessed on its own terms and geographic reach. To measure the order’s effects, look for DOJ filings, court rulings and any state law changes rather than counting laws identified for review as already overturned.

SignedApril 8, 2025
Lead officialsAttorney General and agency heads
Express timingReport within 60 days

Before and after

Before the order

States regulated energy, environment, torts and commerce subject to federal pre-emption and constitutional limits.

After the order

DOJ received a litigation and recommendation mandate; the order itself neither repealed a state law nor decided whether any particular measure is pre-empted.

Energy requested information on state energy laws as part of the review directed by this order.

Who had to do what

Agency / officeActionTiming / position
Attorney GeneralIdentify laws and pursue appropriate litigation60 days / ongoing
Agency headsReport identified state and local measuresAs requested

What happened next

EO 14260 signed.

Later primary evidence reviewed: Energy requested information on state energy laws as part of the review directed by this order.