Executive Order 14325: Amendment to Duties To Address the Flow of Illicit Drugs Across Our Northern Border
President: Donald J. Trump
Raised the additional Canadian duty for goods outside the USMCA preference rules.
Status: Partly revoked. Sources: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, Supreme Court opinion, February 20, 2026 · Executive Order 14389, February 20, 2026, sections 1–2 · Executive Order 14325, signed text.
Is Executive Order 14325 still in effect? Partly. The Supreme Court rejected IEEPA tariffs in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump on February 20, 2026; EO 14389 ended those duties the same day. Section 4’s monitoring of the northern-border emergency survives; the IEEPA tariff provisions no longer operate.

What does Executive Order 14325 do?
This action formed part of the 2025–2026 tariff framework. On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court held that IEEPA does not authorize presidential tariffs; EO 14389 then ended the additional ad valorem duties imposed under the listed IEEPA orders. Measures based on other statutes and the all-country de minimis suspension require separate analysis.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14325
EO 14325 modifies the additional duty framework for certain Canadian imports, including goods that do not qualify for preferential treatment under the U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement. The order adjusts the rate and scope under the existing border-related tariff program. Its terms are in the Federal Register text of EO 14325. It does not impose the same additional duty on every Canadian shipment.
Whether a product qualifies for USMCA preference depends on the agreement’s rules of origin and the documentation for the entry. A good imported from Canada is not necessarily a Canadian-origin good for tariff purposes. Importers must distinguish country of shipment from origin, and must check the order’s exceptions and customs guidance. These details can determine whether the additional duty applies.
The order is part of a sequence of emergency-duty amendments, so the rate in force on the entry date matters. Later actions can extend, change or terminate a temporary rate, and a separate statutory tariff may remain applicable. The order’s stated purpose and the actual duty collected are different questions. Readers should consult the current Harmonized Tariff Schedule and CBP instructions for a specific import.
Before and after
Before the order
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule reflected the then-current reciprocal, country-specific and product-specific treatment.
Earlier orders in the same lineage supplied the baseline that this order amended.
After the order
EO 14389 later ended the Canadian IEEPA additional ad valorem duties.
EO 14389 ended the listed IEEPA additional ad valorem duties after the Supreme Court decision. It expressly preserved non-IEEPA duties and the separate all-country de minimis suspension.
Who had to do what
| Agency / office | Action | Timing / position |
|---|---|---|
| DHS and USTR | Implement the stated tariff or customs change through the Harmonized Tariff Schedule and entry system | August 1, 2025 |
| Commerce, Homeland Security and USTR | Coordinate implementation and later modifications | As directed |
What happened next
EO 14325 signed.
Supreme Court held that IEEPA does not authorize presidential tariffs; EO 14389 ended the listed IEEPA duties.
A separate temporary section 122 surcharge operated under the Trade Act.
Current position checked against the judgment and later presidential action.
Court status
See the court documents in Sources by type.
Legal and source detail
How it works legally
Learning Resources v. Trump held that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. EO 14389 ended the identified IEEPA duties but preserved the underlying emergencies and non-tariff actions. Section 232, section 301, section 122 and customs-law measures stand or fall on their own authority.
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 9, 2026. How we research →