Executive Order 14324: Suspending Duty-Free De Minimis Treatment for All Countries
President: Donald J. Trump
Suspended duty-free de minimis treatment for low-value commercial shipments from all countries.
Status: In effect as amended. The continuing suspension framework, not unchanged historical postal rates.
Is Executive Order 14324 still in effect? Yes. The suspension framework remains operative as amended by EO 14388, signed February 20, 2026 and effective for covered entries from February 24. That order replaced sections 2 and 3, removed the old section 5 definition and renumbered the remaining sections. EO 14389 expressly preserved the separate de minimis action; CBP’s June 24, 2026 rules independently implemented the suspension under customs law. This does not preserve the original IEEPA-based postal rates. Signed replacement and amendment scope; EO 14389, section 2(c); Later postal rule and dates.
What does Executive Order 14324 do?
This action formed part of the 2025–2026 tariff framework. On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court held that IEEPA does not authorize presidential tariffs; EO 14389 then ended the additional ad valorem duties imposed under the listed IEEPA orders. Measures based on other statutes and the all-country de minimis suspension require separate analysis.
Reading the operative provisions of Executive Order 14324
EO 14324 suspends duty-free de minimis treatment for low-value commercial shipments from all countries and directs Customs and Border Protection to use specified collection procedures. The order appears in the Federal Register. It changes the customs treatment of covered low-value imports; it does not mean that every small parcel is automatically subject to the same final amount of duty.
De minimis treatment is a customs rule for qualifying low-value shipments. Removing it can require more data and payment processing for packages that previously entered without ordinary duties. The order distinguishes commercial shipments and assigns CBP a role in collection. Product classification, country of origin, applicable tariff programs and any exception still matter when calculating the charge.
Implementation affects consumers, sellers, carriers and customs brokers. Accurate sender and product information is important because incomplete declarations can delay release or lead to incorrect duty assessments. A change in de minimis treatment also does not itself establish that a package is unsafe or unlawfully imported. The order’s practical impact should be evaluated through CBP instructions, entry data, collection outcomes and any later legal changes affecting the asserted authority.
Section 2 removed the 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) administrative exemption for covered shipments regardless of origin, value or transport mode, except articles covered by 50 U.S.C. 1702(b). Nonpostal shipments moved to appropriate ACE entry procedures; postal shipments initially used a separate collection mechanism. The original postal options depended on the country’s IEEPA rate, including temporary $80/$160/$200 alternatives. Those historical amounts should not be treated as current charges. Original sections 2–4.
EO 14388 amended the text rather than merely announcing a new policy: it replaced sections 2 and 3, struck the old section 5 definition, and renumbered the remaining sections. The amendment kept the suspension but changed the postal-rate mechanism and tied the interim arrangement to a later entry process. Sections 2–5.
CBP’s June 24, 2026 interim final rules independently suspended the administrative exemption under 19 U.S.C. 1321. Both suspension provisions took effect June 24, while the postal rule’s remaining provisions took effect July 24. These rules preserve the separate gift and traveler exemptions and distinguish the postal process from nonpostal formal/informal entry. Postal rule, dates and background; Nonpostal rule, dates and authority.
CBP’s October 14 announcement extended the specified international-mail informal-entry compliance date from October 22, 2026 to January 20, 2027. It concerns postal shipments subject to section 201, 232 or 301 duties or partner-agency requirements: Entry Type 13 is the electronic informal-entry route, with formal entry remaining an alternative. It is not a restoration of duty-free treatment or an immediate mandate for every postal package. CBP described its October 8 broader filing proposal separately as proposed, with comments due December 7. Official dated extension and covered shipments; Separate notice of proposed rulemaking.
Before and after
Before the order
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule reflected the then-current reciprocal, country-specific and product-specific treatment.
Earlier orders in the same lineage supplied the baseline that this order amended.
After the order
EO 14388 amended this order after the IEEPA tariff ruling. CBP’s later June regulations independently relied on customs law; those regulations are distinct from the authority invoked in the presidential order. Signed amendment; Independent regulatory authority.
EO 14389 ended the listed IEEPA additional ad valorem duties after the Supreme Court decision. It expressly preserved non-IEEPA duties and the separate all-country de minimis suspension.
Who had to do what
| Agency / actor | Original direction or role | Timing and limits |
|---|---|---|
| Homeland Security Secretary | Lead lawful implementation; determine HTSUS modifications consulting USITC; consult listed officials where appropriate; may redelegate within DHS; section 4(c). Bear publication costs under section 7(d). | Original sections 2–3 apply to covered entries from August 29, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time. No separate numerical deadline for notices/costs. |
| U.S. Customs and Border Protection | Administer the postal process, establish and publish a new entry process, and implement the severability provisions; sections 2(b), 4(d) and 6. May require a basic importation/entry bond and ensure adequate carrier bonds. | New-process publication is event-based, not a fixed number of days. Some bond powers are discretionary; later rules supply actual requirements. |
| U.S. International Trade Commission | Consult with DHS on necessary HTSUS modifications and implementation; section 4(c). | As needed; not assigned an independent lead or numerical deadline. |
| Secretary of State | Consult with DHS where appropriate under section 4(c). | During implementation as appropriate; no separate reporting clock. |
| Treasury Secretary | Consult with DHS where appropriate under section 4(c). | During implementation as appropriate; not a co-lead for every entry-system change. |
| Attorney General | Consult with DHS where appropriate under section 4(c). | During implementation as appropriate; no independent report deadline. |
| Commerce Secretary | Consult with DHS; section 4(c). Original section 6(b)(ii) also makes notification of postal collection-system readiness the trigger after tariff invalidation; section 1 records prior global readiness. | Notification is event-triggered, not a new fixed deadline; EO 14388 later records the postal notification and amends the framework. |
| United States Trade Representative | Consult with DHS where appropriate under section 4(c). | During implementation as appropriate; no separate numerical clock. |
| Postmaster General | Consult with DHS where appropriate under section 4(c). | Consultation role, not sole responsibility for all tariff remittance or a new USPS-wide collection deadline. |
| All executive departments and agencies | Take appropriate measures within their own authority; section 4(c). | As required for lawful implementation; no additional authority to disregard other law. |
| Postal transportation carriers or qualified substitute parties | Collect/remit duties using the original permitted method and declare origin; carriers maintain international carrier bonds; sections 3 and 4(d). | Method changes no more than once per calendar month unless CBP provides otherwise, with at least 24-hour notice. Original specific-duty option: six months, but section 3 was replaced by EO 14388 before that period ended. |
| Parties qualified to make entry | Use an appropriate ACE entry type for formerly exempt nonpostal shipments; retain required ACE entry for postal goods subject to AD/CVD or quota; sections 2(a) and 3(f). | Original framework from August 29, 2025; later amendments/regulations control current procedures. |
Full original signed assignments. This table separates original leads, consultation partners, private filing/collection duties and discretionary powers. Later rules and amendments, not the original table alone, govern a current entry. General OMB savings language is not a new substantive assignment.
What happened next
EO 14324 signed.
The original global order was published in the Federal Register. Official publication.
The original sections 2–3 applied to covered entries from 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time. Section 4(a).
The Supreme Court rejected IEEPA tariff authority. EO 14388 separately amended the de minimis framework, and EO 14389 expressly left that action unaffected. Separate amendment and preserved framework.
EO 14388’s modifications applied to covered entries from 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time. Section 5(a).
EO 14388 was published in the Federal Register after its signing and specified entry date. Official publication.
CBP’s postal/nonpostal interim final rules independently suspended the administrative exemption; suspension provisions took effect that day. Dates and independent customs basis.
A separate temporary section 122 surcharge operated under the Trade Act.
The postal rule’s remaining provisions took effect, distinct from its June 24 suspension provision and later specified compliance window. Distinct effective dates.
Current position checked against the judgment and later presidential action.
CBP proposed broader low-value filing and bonding changes, with comments due December 7; the proposal itself did not adopt those changes. NPRM action and dates.
CBP announced the extension of the specified postal informal-entry compliance date to January 20, 2027, with formal entry remaining an alternative. Dated official extension.
Court status
See the court documents in Sources by type.
Legal and source detail
How it works legally
The presidential orders invoked IEEPA and the stated emergency, tariff-schedule and delegation authorities. CBP’s June 2026 regulations independently relied on customs authority under 19 U.S.C. 1321; an executive order and an agency regulation are distinct legal acts. The Supreme Court’s February 20, 2026 holding concerns presidential tariff power under IEEPA, not a judicial decision restoring the de minimis exemption. EO 14389 preserved the separate de minimis action and non-tariff measures. Controlling tariff holding; Preserved measures, sections 1–2; Later scope and authority.
Sources by type
If a source is unavailable, first check the cited publisher or another official repository. The cited publisher remains the authority.
Primary and official sources
Orders, laws, court records and official implementation material.
- EO 14256 — original China/Hong Kong framework
- EO 14388 — textual amendments and distinct entry date
- EO 14389 — preserved de minimis and non-tariff actions
- CBP — June 24, 2026 postal interim final rule
- CBP — June 24, 2026 nonpostal interim final rule
- CBP — October 8, 2026 proposed low-value entry rule
- CBP — October 14, 2026 postal compliance-date extension
How we checked this
Last checked against the sources above on September 9, 2026. How we research →
Additional evidence review: October 17, 2026. Compared original actor assignments and timing, later textual replacements, dated customs rules and implementation notices. The reviewed records do not establish every original report’s fulfillment or resolve individual entry eligibility, refunds or every later court challenge.